Iran is undertaking a clear strategy in exporting not only its Khomini revolution but also its internal problems. It adopts the policy of fighting its battles on the enemy lands and throwing the flame ball away from the internal contradictions so that their blaze will not increase and explode by touching these blaze balls that Iran throws away from its net.
Iran knows that its internal situation is not intact and that a smallest ball of flames that comes closer to its contradiction's wood will send it ablaze within the Iranian borders. This explains why it endeavors to open many fronts outside its borders to keep its enemies preoccupied.
Iran doesn't care about the losses that happen due to its side battles. It doesn't heed the fractures that are caused by its policy among the region's people and within one nation. It doesn't care about the blazes as long as they burn in Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain or Syria, and it is difficult to imagine that Iran observes the Muslim community unity, unless it is a unity that is desired by the Mullahs' system. It is a unity that is submitted to a Khomeini Mullah and the deputy of the occulting imam.
Iran's wars outside its borders offer Iran another trait, in terms of its seeming to be an intact country from within, whose social structure cannot be assaulted. That is why Iran doesn't want her enemies to play the same game with her. If they did they will obtain the same results that Iran finds in directing her wars outside her borders.
Based on this the Arabs have to play Iran's hand. There are Sunnis and Shiites in Iran, and thus the playing on the chord of grievances that Iranian Sunnis are suffering is desirable, especially that there is a sense of injustice by most of the Sunni sect in Iran who have not got even one mosque in the capital of the Mullahs.
In Iran there are the Ahwazi Arabs who are our brothers in religion and nationality and their land is an Arab land. They have their history and political status that Iran cannot erase.
Supporting the Arab people in Ahwaz for obtaining their cultural and economic rights is also a desirable issue. The support to the Arab Ahwazi will ease pressure on the Syrian, Yemeni and Gulf Arabs. Mere waving with the support of the demands of the Ahwazi Arabs will make the Iranian policy makers think twice that they are also living in a fragile glass house.
There are Kurds in Iran who feel racial discrimination against them and undertake armed struggle for obtaining their rights which they found in Iraq and they lack it in Iran. There are also oppressed Sunnis, Azures , who the Arabs should extend their hands to them, so that Iran feels that she is not the only who masters dancing on more than a rope at the same time.
Arabs should deal with Iran as a peer, according to the policy of a "tit for a tat" as they are more powerful and have more recourses if they agreed on one policy towards Iran's ambitions, regading the people's interests in the region. We only lack a clear strategy for confrontation. I don't mean the military confrontation, but the diplomatic, cultural and economic one in confronting Iran from within.
The distant observation to Iran shows a great deal of harmonization, however drawing closer reveals the contradictions within its mosaic. This is what the Arabs need; to see the current weakness of Iran.
We should not pass this station without mentioning the role of the Arab media that is directed to the Iranian people. Iran is funding over 40 Arabic speaking channels that are spreading malignance, religious hatred and sectarian discrimination. They swarm with discrimination against Arabs. There is a need for directing a number of Persian speaking channels to Iran, and it will know that she is weaker than she or the Arabs think.
Iran's position is similar to the old European colonizers, who used to interfere in our countries under pretexts of protecting the Arab Christian minority, until it controlled most of the Arab territories. Iran is doing the same today by interfering in the Arab Affairs under excuse of the protection of Arab Shiites so that it imposes what it sees as historical, regional and international dues.
As the Christian minorities were not the real reason for the interference of the European colonization in our countries, the protection of the Arab Shiites is also not the real reason behind Iran's endeavor to interfere into our affairs. The goal is clear. It is the control of the sources of the region, breaking the peoples willpower and to impose a regional supremacy. If the protection of the Arab Shiites is the motivation for Iran, she would have given the Shiites of the other races in Iran their due rights, instead of forcing the Persian language on them and denying them to keep their cultural heritage.
The only option before the Arabs is to abandon disunity and gather around an Arab project which one can say that its features started to appear. One reminds in this respect that the Arabs can play with the trump card of the regional balance in coordination with Turkey for curbing the Iranian impetuousness.
Turkey tries to draw closer to the Arabs to spite the Europeans, so why don't we try to draw closer to it for spiting Iran, especially that the Turks posses a civilized civil project and the Turkish experience is more mature and closer to modernity rhythm than the Mullah s' one, which still believes in the occulting Mahdi that controls the whole world as he wishes.
I know that Iran's agents will say that this is an attempt to replace the Israeli intrigue with Iran and this is an argument that even deserve no response, because those who raise it couldn't prove up to now that Iran really wants to eliminate Israel from the map as they allege. And because Iran and Israel are exchanging great services on the expense of the Arabs.
The Iranian policy offers Israel the service it needs regarding the international support under subterfuge of the Iranian threats, at a time that we know Israel sees that their dispute is with the Arabs and not the Iranians. It is an existence dispute. Israel is giving Iran its legitimacy for the nuclear ambition, which no rational person believes that it is directed to Israel which possesses the strategic deterrent, but it is directed to the Arabs who lack it.
Israel makes Iran appear as the defender of the Islamic nation in the face of the global arrogant forces. These forces which are not burnt by the fire of Iran, such as in Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon and other Arab countries.
I also know that Iran agents will say that one should either be in the camp of the struggle sector represented by Iran and Asad regimes, or to be with the eradication of the cursed America and Israel only in the slogans of Iran not her practices. I answer to this .
,that this is an old boring tale, because resistance to Iran is only the resistance of the aspirations of the Syrian people for a decent life.
Their options to the Arabs to choose between Iran or Israel is a big fallacy, because we should not be given the option to chose between two projects that are contesting on the occupation of our territories and the plunder of our people's resources.
It is unjust to choose between grazing the camels of Ahmedi Najad or the pigs of Netanyahu, as an Iranian writer once put it in our country. The right thing is that our best option is to graze our own camels.
It is up to anyone to choose to graze the camels of Najad or the pigs of Netanyahu, but he cannot force us to choose between the great Satan of America or the great Satan of Iran, because the choice between one Satan or another is a kind of coercion that the missionaries of the Iranian project want the Arab region to come to.